d-orbital occupation and electronic configurations
To be able to use Crystal Field Theory (CFT) successfully, it is
essential that you can determine the electronic
configuration of the central metal ion in any
complex.
This requires being able to recognise all the entities making up
the complex and knowing whether the ligands are neutral or
anionic, so that you can determine the oxidation
number of the metal ion.
In many cases the oxidation number for first row transition metal
ions will be either (II) or (III), but in any case you may find
it easier to start with the M(II) from which you can easily add
or subtract electrons to get the final electronic configuration.
A simple procedure exists for the M(II) case.
First write out all the first row transition metals with their
symbols and atomic numbers:
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
Ti |
V |
Cr |
Mn |
Fe |
Co |
Ni |
Cu |
To see the number of electrons in the 3d orbitals then cross
off the first 2, hence:
So, the electronic configuration of Ni(II) is
d8 and the electronic configuration of
Mn(II) is d5.
What is the electronic configuration of Fe(III)?
Well, using the above scheme, Fe(II) would be d6, by
subtracting a further electron to make the ion more positive, the
configuration of Fe(III) will be
d5.
This simple procedure works fine for first row transition
metal ions, but sorry it is no good for 2nd or 3rd row
elements!
Note: For all final Chemistry examinations, a Periodic Table
is provided in the inside back cover of the examination booklets.
A Periodic Table may NOT necessarily be provided for course
tests.
Oxidation Numbers and their Relative Stabilities
The IUPAC definition of the oxidation number in a coordination
compound is:
the charge a central atom in a coordination entity
would bear if all the ligands were removed along with the
electron pairs that were shared with the central atom. It is
represented by a Roman numeral.
The transition metals show a wide range of oxidation numbers. The
reason for this is the closeness of 3d and 4s energy states as
discussed above. The Table below summarises known oxidation
numbers of the first row transition elements. The most prevalent
oxidation numbers are shown in bold and those in
blue are likely to be met in this
course.
Known Oxidation Numbers of First Row Transition Elements*
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
Sc |
Ti |
V |
Cr |
Mn |
Fe |
Co |
Ni |
Cu |
Zn |
|
I |
I |
I |
I |
I |
I |
I |
I |
|
|
II |
II |
II |
II |
II |
II |
II |
II |
II |
III |
III |
III |
III |
III |
III |
III |
III |
III |
|
|
IV |
IV |
IV |
IV |
IV |
IV |
IV |
|
|
|
|
V |
V |
V |
V |
V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VI |
VI |
VI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VII |
|
|
|
|
|
* The oxidation number zero usually assigned to the elemental
state has been omitted from the Table. The elements Cr to Co form
several metal carbonyl compounds where the metals are considered
to have an oxidation number of zero.
A number of important conclusions can be drawn from this
Table.
1. There is an increase in the number of oxidation numbers from
Sc to Mn. All seven oxidation numbers are exhibited by Mn. The
oxidation number of VII represents the formal loss of all seven
electrons from 3d and 4s orbitals. In fact all of the elements in
the series can utilize all the electrons in their 3d and 4s
orbitals.
2. There is a decrease in the number of oxidation states from Mn
to Zn.
This is because the pairing of d-electrons occurs after Mn
(Hund's rule) which in turn decreases the number of available
unpaired electrons and hence, the number of oxidation states.
3. The stability of higher oxidation states decreases in moving
from Sc to Zn. Mn(VII) and Fe(VI) are powerful oxidizing agents
and the higher oxidation states of Co, Ni and Zn are unknown.
4. The relative stability of the +2 state with respect to higher
oxidation states, particularly the +3 state increases in moving
from left to right. This is justifiable since it will be
increasingly difficult to remove the third electron from the d
orbitals.
5. There is a tendency of intermediate oxidation states to
disproportionate. For example,
Mn(VI) → Mn(IV) + Mn(VII)
Cu(I) → Cu(0) + Cu(II).
6. The lower oxidation numbers are usually found in ionic
compounds and higher oxidation numbers tend to be involved in
covalent compounds.
The relative stability of oxidation numbers is an extremely
important topic in transition metal chemistry and is usually
discussed in terms of the standard reduction potential (E°)
values. Thermodynamically E° values are equated to ΔG° values by
the relationship: ΔG° = -nFEĀ° where n = number of electrons
involved and F = Faraday of electricity. Hence, the E° values
indicate the possibility of spontaneous change from one oxidation
state to the other. This value however, does not give any
information about the reaction rate. Predictions regarding the
stability of a particular oxidation state of an element can be
made from the Tables of Redox values found in any standard text
book or online.
return to CHEM1902 (C10K) course
outline
Return to Chemistry, UWI-Mona,
Home Page
Copyright © 1997-2015 by Robert John
Lancashire, all rights reserved.
Created and maintained by Prof. Robert J.
Lancashire,
The Department of Chemistry, University of the West Indies,
Mona Campus, Kingston 7, Jamaica.
Created June 1997. Last modified 3rd March 2015.
URL:
http://wwwchem.uwimona.edu.jm/courses/IC10Kec.html